In many projects, the same traffic source looks completely different depending on where you check it. GA4 groups channels one way, while the BI system applies its own logic.
As a result, “Paid Search” revenue in GA4 might be $100K, while the BI dashboard shows $130K — and nobody knows which number to trust.
Why is this a problem?
These discrepancies come from inconsistent grouping and attribution rules:
• GA4 relies on default channel groupings unless you customize them.
• BI tools often map traffic sources based on UTM standards or custom rules.
• Attribution windows differ, splitting the same revenue across different buckets.
The outcome? Two official-looking reports that don’t align. For leadership, it undermines trust in the numbers and stalls decision-making.
Revenue attribution only works if everyone plays by the same rules. Without a unified source dictionary and consistent attribution logic, GA4 and BI will always tell different stories — leaving the business caught in the middle.
Here’s the playbook I use with clients:
• Lock in a single source dictionary and attribution canon.
• Implement reconciliation dashboards.
• Normalize data via pipelines before it hits reporting tools.
• Document the entire process so rules are clear and repeatable.
Analytics should reduce uncertainty, not create it. The moment you unify rules, the revenue story starts making sense again.
Want to get all my top Linkedin content? I regularly upload it to one Notion doc.
Go here to download it for FREE.
