In cross-channel funnels, it’s common for a user to first interact with an ad and later respond to an email sequence. However, Meta may still take credit for the final purchase - even if email was the decisive touch.

This tends to happen when:

• A user clicks an ad earlier in the journey
• They later engage with email communications
• They purchase after the email, but Meta still attributes the sale to the ad due to attribution windows and tracking rules

Consequences:

• Meta’s performance appears inflated
• Email impact is underreported
• Budget decisions are made on incomplete data
• ROI calculations skew toward the wrong acquisition source

To fix this, you need visibility into how identifiers flow through all systems:

• Evaluate the consistency between Meta data, CRM records, and attribution settings
• Understand how the Conversions API stitches events
• Examine identifier priority and matching logic
• Experiment with alternative models to assess differences

Once the systems are aligned, reporting becomes clearer, and budget planning reflects what genuinely drives conversions - not just what a particular platform claims.

Disagree? Welcome to the comment section.

Want to get all my top Linkedin content? I regularly upload it to one Notion doc.

Go here to download it for FREE.