Why does growth suddenly feel harder to control?
I’ve seen this happen during scale-ups. More channels, more budgets, more experiments. Reports stay the same. Metrics stay the same. But confidence quietly disappears.
At some point, you’re “growing” — yet you’re less sure what’s actually driving it.
Where does the model stop keeping up?
Most analytics models are built for a simpler world. Fewer channels. Clear cause-and-effect. Once scale kicks in, the same metrics start aggregating very different processes under one number.
The metric doesn’t break. Its meaning does.
What’s easy to miss during scaling?
What worked early on starts distorting reality later. A KPI that once explained growth now hides complexity:
• mixed channel economics
• different user intents
• uneven marginal returns
How I approach this reset
Every scale jump triggers a measurement review. I add segmentation layers, introduce control metrics, and clearly define where old KPIs are no longer applicable. Scaling requires evolving the measurement model — not trusting inertia.
Want to get all my top Linkedin content? I regularly upload it to one Notion doc.
Go here to download it for FREE.


